<%namespace name="tools" file="tools.tex"/>
<%! import os %>
\textbf{Experiment description}\newline
The purpose of research programme M1263-3 was to verify the scale relations and the reliability of the deterministic dune erosion method according to Vellinga (1986), \citep{Vellinga1984}. In total 5 tests were performed in the Delta Flume of WL | Delft Hydraulics in the period of November 1980 till May 1981. Test 1 and Test 2 were performed at a depth scale of 5 and with a constant water level. In Test 1 the Dutch reference profile (see Figure 1.1) was used as initial profile with a geometric contraction of $S_0$ = 3, while in Test 2 a geometric contraction of $S_0$ = 2 was applied. Test 3 was performed at the same depth scale as Test 2 and with the same initial profile, but with a varying water level. In Test 4 the storm surge of 1953 in The Netherlands was reproduced at a depth scale 3.27. Test 5 can be considered as a full-scale replica 1:1 of a moderate storm in nature; the reference profile was used with a steepness factor of S 0 = 2.47. The Delta Flume is approximately 230 m long, 5 m wide and 7 to 9 m deep. At the time these tests were performed the wave board in the Delta flume was not yet equipped with active reflection compensation (ARC) nor with second-order wave steering.

The five experiments are presented in \autoref{tab:experiments_M1263III}. Tests 1, 2 and 5 had a constant surge level, while tests 3 and 4 had a variable surge level with a course depicted in \autoref{fig:hydraulicconditions_Test3} and \autoref{fig:hydraulicconditions_Test4} respectively.

\begin{table}[H]
  \caption{Overview of experiments}
  \label{tab:experiments_M1263III}
  \begin{center}
    \begin{tabular}{lllllll}
      \hline
      Experiment & Depth-scale & Profile     & Sediment & Water & Wave   & Wave   \\ 
                 &       & contraction & diameter & depth & height & period \\ 
      \hline
      1          & 5     & 1.91        & 225      & 4.2   & 1.50   & 5.4    \\ 
      2          & 5     & 1.27        & 225      & 4.2   & 1.50   & 5.4    \\ 
      3          & 5     & 1.27        & 225      & 4.2   & 1.50   & 5.4    \\ 
      \hline
      4          & 3.27  & 1.91        & 225      & 4.2   & 1.85   & 5.0    \\ 
      5          & 1     & 1           & 225      & 5.0   & 2.00   & 7.6    \\ 
      \hline
    \end{tabular}
  \end{center}
\end{table}




${tools.image(os.path.join(input_path, 'Deltaflume_M1263/III/Test-3/'), 'hydraulicconditions_Test3.eps', 'Boundary conditions for test 3. The storm development is shown for the water level (upper panel), the wave height (second panel) and the peak period (lower panel) as a function of time.')}
${tools.image(os.path.join(input_path, 'Deltaflume_M1263/III/Test-4/'), 'hydraulicconditions_Test4.eps', 'Boundary conditions for test 4. The storm development is shown for the water level (upper panel), the wave height (second panel) and the peak period (lower panel) as a function of time.')}

\textbf{Results}\newline
The profile developments are shown in \autoref{fig:Deltaflume_M1263_III_Test-1_Test-1_BOI_profiles} to \autoref{fig:Deltaflume_M1263_III_Test-5_Test-5_BOI_profiles}. In \autoref{tab:Deltaflume_M1263_III_Test-1_indicator} to \autoref{tab:Deltaflume_M1263_III_Test-5_indicator}, the indicators for different moments in time are shown. Next to the profiles, the relative errors as a function of time are shown in \autoref{fig:Deltaflume_M1263_III_Test-1_Test-1_BOI_errorTime}, \autoref{fig:Deltaflume_M1263_III_Test-2_Test-2_BOI_errorTime}, \autoref{fig:Deltaflume_M1263_III_Test-3_Test-3_BOI_errorTime}, \autoref{fig:Deltaflume_M1263_III_Test-4_Test-4_BOI_errorTime} and \autoref{fig:Deltaflume_M1263_III_Test-5_Test-5_BOI_errorTime}. Note that the depth-scale factor is relatively small for Test-4 and Test-5. This means that the grid resolution is also relatively large compared to the others tests, which affects the dune retreat indicator since the dune retreat is defined as the 1.5 grid cell below the maximum dune height. Therefore, the dune retreat indicator is not shown for these two tests since it does not represent correctly dune retreat.

${tools.image('Deltaflume_M1263_III/Test-1/', 'Test-1_BOI_profiles.eps', 'Comparisons of profiles from experiment Test-1 for different moments in time. Observed profiles are shown with a dashed line and the XBeach profiles with a solid line. The storm surge level is shown with a black dashed line.',width=150)}
${tools.table('Deltaflume_M1263_III/Test-1', 'indicator.tex', 'Indicators for Test-1',small=True)}
${tools.image('Deltaflume_M1263_III/Test-1/', 'Test-1_BOI_errorTime.eps', 'Temporal development of the relative error for the three indicators.')}

${tools.image('Deltaflume_M1263_III/Test-2/', 'Test-2_BOI_profiles.eps', 'Comparisons of profiles from experiment Test-2 for different moments in time. Observed profiles are shown with a dashed line and the XBeach profiles with a solid line. The storm surge level is shown with a black dashed line.',width=150)}
${tools.table('Deltaflume_M1263_III/Test-2', 'indicator.tex', 'Indicators for Test-2',small=True)}
${tools.image('Deltaflume_M1263_III/Test-2/', 'Test-2_BOI_errorTime.eps', 'Temporal development of the relative error for the three indicators.')}

${tools.image('Deltaflume_M1263_III/Test-3/', 'Test-3_BOI_profiles.eps', 'Comparisons of profiles from experiment Test-3 for different moments in time. Observed profiles are shown with a dashed line and the XBeach profiles with a solid line. The storm surge level is shown with a black dashed line.',width=150)}
${tools.table('Deltaflume_M1263_III/Test-3', 'indicator.tex', 'Indicators for Test-3',small=True)}
${tools.image('Deltaflume_M1263_III/Test-3/', 'Test-3_BOI_errorTime.eps', 'Temporal development of the relative error for the three indicators.')}


${tools.image('Deltaflume_M1263_III/Test-4/', 'Test-4_BOI_profiles.eps', 'Comparisons of profiles from experiment Test-4 for different moments in time. Observed profiles are shown with a dashed line and the XBeach profiles with a solid line. The storm surge level is shown with a black dashed line.',width=150)}
${tools.table('Deltaflume_M1263_III/Test-4', 'indicator.tex', 'Indicators for Test-4',small=True)}
${tools.image('Deltaflume_M1263_III/Test-4/', 'Test-4_BOI_errorTime.eps', 'Temporal development of the relative error for the three indicators.')}

${tools.image('Deltaflume_M1263_III/Test-5/', 'Test-5_BOI_profiles.eps', 'Comparisons of profiles from experiment Test-5 for different moments in time. Observed profiles are shown with a dashed line and the XBeach profiles with a solid line. The storm surge level is shown with a black dashed line.',width=150)}
${tools.table('Deltaflume_M1263_III/Test-5', 'indicator.tex', 'Indicators for Test-5',small=True)}
${tools.image('Deltaflume_M1263_III/Test-5/', 'Test-5_BOI_errorTime.eps', 'Temporal development of the relative error for the three indicators.')}

\textbf{Overview}\newline
The statistical scores for all experiments are shown \autoref{fig:M1263_overview} in \autoref{tab:DGM1263_overview}.

${tools.image('Deltaflume_M1263_III/', 'overview.eps', 'Overview of the statistical scores for M1263 experiments.',label='M1263_overview')}

${tools.table('Deltaflume_M1263_III/', 'skill.tex', 'Statistical scores for Deltagoot M1263 experiments', 'DGM1263_overview')}



