SWIG:Examples:ruby:value

SWIG/Examples/ruby/value/

Passing and Returning Structures by Value

Occasionally, a C program will manipulate structures by value such as shown in the following code:

/* File : example.c */

typedef struct Vector {
   double x, y, z;
} Vector;

double dot_product(Vector a, Vector b) {
  return (a.x*b.x + a.y*b.y + a.z*b.z);
}

Vector vector_add(Vector a, Vector b) {
  Vector r;
  r.x = a.x + b.x;
  r.y = a.y + b.y;
  r.z = a.z + b.z;
  return r;
}

Since SWIG only knows how to manage pointers to structures (not their internal representation), the following translations are made when wrappers are created:

double wrap_dot_product(Vector *a, Vector *b) {
    return dot_product(*a,*b);
}

Vector *wrap_vector_add(Vector *a, Vector *b) {
    Vector *r = (Vector *) malloc(sizeof(Vector));
    *r = vector_add(*a,*b);
    return r;
}

The functions are then called using pointers from the scripting language interface. It should also be noted that any function that returns a structure by value results in an implicit memory allocation. This will be a memory leak unless you take steps to free the result (see below).

The SWIG interface

Click here to see a SWIG interface file that wraps these two functions. In this file, there are a few essential features:

A wrapper for the free() function is created so that we can clean up the return result created by vector_add() function.
The %inline directive is used to create a few helper functions for creating new Vector objects and to print out the value (for debugging purposes).

A Ruby Script

Click here to see a script that uses these functions from Ruby.

Notes

When the '-c++' option is used, the resulting wrapper code for the return value changes to the following:

Vector *wrap_vector_add(Vector *a, Vector *b) {
    Vector *r = new Vector(vector_add(*a,*b));
    return r;
}

If you define C structure (or C++ class with '-c++' option) in the interface file, the SWIG generated wrappers can automaticallyclean up the result of return-by-reference by GC.
Passing parameters by value like this really isn't the best C programming style. If possible, you might change your application to use pointers.
Similar translations are made when C++ references are used.